If Ripple wins the SEC lawsuit, it could have huge implications for the future of digital assets. Ripple is arguing that it was never given a fair warning it was in violation of the securities laws, and that the SEC is making classifications based on bias, not on merit.
Table of Contents
Ripple is on the winning side of the SEC lawsuit
The SEC’s latest report claims that Ripple is on the winning side of its lawsuit against it, but there are questions raised by some crypto enthusiasts as to whether the suit is actually justified. Some have wondered whether the SEC is deliberately stalling the case. Another crypto lawyer, Bob Fox, has expressed skepticism over the case.
The SEC has accused Ripple of illegal fundraising practices and has been holding two of the company’s co-founders and CEO, Christian Larsen, accountable for their actions. The lawsuit is important because if Ripple is found guilty, XRP will be classified as a security and could set a precedent for other cryptos.
Although the SEC’s lawsuit has been ongoing since last fall, there are some developments in the case that have boosted Ripple’s position. First, Judge Sarah Netburn ordered the SEC to turn over William Hinman’s speech from 2018. This evidence, Ripple argues, would support their “fair notice” defense. In response, the SEC is preparing to file an appeal of the order.
Ripple’s legal team argued that the SEC failed to provide “fair notice” that its conduct was unlawful. The court agreed, and ruled against the SEC. Ripple claimed that the SEC had failed to provide clarity about the XRP label, thereby violating its due process rights.
Ripple claims it had no fair notice that it was in violation of securities law
In December of 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple for offering $1.3 billion worth of unregistered securities. The SEC claims that the company violated Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 by selling unregistered securities and by not giving investors any prior notice.
Ripple has been fighting the case against it. The SEC has accused Ripple Labs of selling unregistered digital assets. The SEC claims that Ripple sold the digital assets without providing investors with any fair notice that it was violating the Securities Act of 1933.
Ripple has denied these allegations, stating that they were simply legal conclusions, not allegations. Ripple has continued to pursue its CBDC business outside of court. The SEC is still reviewing the case, so it may take a while for a final resolution.
Ripple has filed a response to the SEC’s lawsuit. The company denies the allegations, referring to the full text of a document it filed. The SEC’s complaint is based on a document that Ripple released to investors in December 2017 in which it explained its plan for XRP. This document is allegedly false and misleading. The SEC alleges that Ripple failed to provide investors with a fair warning before it made public its plans.
The SEC’s decision is important in the case because it will test the SEC’s authority to regulate digital assets. It may determine whether crypto technology can continue to grow in the U.S.
Ripple claims the SEC is making classifications based on bias rather than actual merit
Ripple’s legal case against the SEC is a significant one. Its attorneys have made claims that the SEC failed to properly warn the company about the risk of being classified as a security. While the SEC accepted that Ripple never received any warning, it has argued that the SEC applied the security concept to virtual currencies based on bias and not actual merit.
As a result, Ripple has won several significant motions in the case. The most recent victory was a ruling that the SEC must release documents related to Ripple’s alleged securities practices. The company also won the release of two important documents that provide assurance as to how the agency classified XRP when it entered circulation in 2012.
The SEC’s notes from meetings between its staff and Ripple’s lawyers reveal internal thinking processes that may not be revealed by a company’s documents. The notes were prepared by SEC officials from the Divisions of Enforcement and Corporation Finance as well as the counsel to the SEC commissioner. Although Ripple’s lawyers argue that the notes do not reflect the organization’s interests, the SEC maintains that they reflect the interests of SEC officials and are not admissible as evidence.
The lawsuit is still in the discovery phase and could take several years to resolve. The lawsuit will affect a number of virtual currencies and may limit their development. This extra SEC regulation could severely hamper the development of these technologies in the U.S. However, many people argue that the risk of criminal use of these technologies is not high enough to require extra regulation.
